Cases 21 - 30 of 1,014
Brown v. Newsday INC et al
as 2:2023cv04805
Plaintiff:
Thurman Jerome Brown
Defendant:
Newsday INC, The Baldwin & Rockville Center Heralds, Chief Court Reporter Margaret O'Shea-Schell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hall v. Jackson
as 2:2023cv04606
Plaintiff:
Beresford A. Hall
Defendant:
Suffolk County, Sufolk County 3rd PCT Police Department, PO Todd Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03954
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Garcia et al v. IL Postino, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04053
Plaintiff:
Julio Tellez Garcia
Defendant:
IL Postino, Inc. and Luigi Russo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fl Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
McCoy v. Smith et al
as 2:2023cv02615
Plaintiff:
Tymiek I. McCoy
Defendant:
Kevin Smith, Raymond Stock, Paul Russo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jimenez v. Russo et al
as 1:2023cv00368
Plaintiff:
Dayvid Jimenez
Defendant:
Sheriff Patrick A. Russo and Under-Sheriff P.J. Higgitt, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Trustees of the Nurses and Local 813 IBT Retirement Plan v. Russo
as 1:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Nurses and Local 813 IBT Retirement Plan
Defendant:
John L Russo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv07861
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Moore v. UserTesting, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv10484
Defendant:
Jon Moore, UserTesting, Inc., Andrew MacMillan and others
O'Dell v. UserTesting, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv10071
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
UserTesting, Inc., Andrew Braccia, Andrew MacMillan and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
