Cases 21 - 30 of 63
Patricia Johnson v. TRG Customer Solutions, Inc.
as 5:2019cv01463
Defendant:
TRG CUSTOMER SOLUTIONS, INC. D/B/A IBEX GLOBAL SOLUTIONS and TRG Customer Solutions, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Patricia Johnson, Rachael Ranick, MarQuise Love and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Myles v. Applewhite et al
as 4:2019cv04918
Defendant:
Cpt. Curtis Jordan, Counsel Substitute III Rachael J. Smith and Cpt. Carlos Applewhite
Plaintiff:
Floyd Dewayne Myles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Schmall et al
as 4:2019cv00579
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Rachael L Rodriguez, Nicole A Brace, Michael J Brace and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2019cv01701
Defendant:
CARBER HOLDINGS, INC.
Plaintiff:
RACHAEL MOORE and NICOLE WARE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Ruiz v. Serrano-Danzy et al
as 1:2018cv00052
Plaintiff:
Rachael S Ruiz
Defendant:
Vick Stan, City Of Austin, Gabriel Dobkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cohen v. Allstate Insuance Company et al
as 4:2017cv02484
Defendant:
Rachael G Ray, Allstate Insuance Company and Allstate Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Mr. Al Cohen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
DeBoy v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 5:2017cv00715
Plaintiff:
Rachael DeBoy
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Hatley v. Vendor Resource Management et al
as 4:2017cv02067
Plaintiff:
Rachael Hatley
Defendant:
Vendor Resource Management , Navy Federal Credit Union and The Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191
Elmore v. Chapa
as 1:2017cv00061
Respondent:
Rachael Chapa
Petitioner:
Charles W Elmore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Blizzard v. Evans et al
as 4:2016cv00829
Plaintiff:
Rachael Blizzard
Defendant:
Eric Neff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
