Cases 21 - 30 of 49
Wright v. Thompson
as 3:2023cv00589
Petitioner:
Ronald Allen Wright
Respondent:
Rachel Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rafiq v. Thompson
as 1:2023cv00086
Petitioner:
Shabbar Rafiq
Respondent:
Rachel Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thompson v. Independence Charter Township
as 2:2022cv13095
Plaintiff:
Rachel Thompson
Defendant:
Independence Charter Township
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Parfinim NV v. Tellez
as 4:2022cv01102
Petitioner:
Parfinim NV
Respondent:
Warden Heriberto Tellez and Rachel Thompson
Not Classified By Court:
Aiden Fine Arts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rafiq v. Thompson
as 1:2022cv01317
Petitioner:
Shabbar Rafiq
Respondent:
Rachel Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Parfinim NV v. Tellez
as 1:2022cv05260
Petitioner:
Parfinim NV
Respondent:
Warden Heriberto Tellez and Warden Rachel Thompson
Interested Party:
Aiden Fine Arts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 U.S. Defendant
Thompson v. Safepoint Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv01238
Plaintiff:
Rachel Thompson
Defendant:
Safepoint Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Lee v. Thompson
as 4:2022cv00232
Petitioner:
Christopher G. Lee
Respondent:
Rachel Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Scholl v. Thompson et al
as 1:2021cv01774
Petitioner:
Lesley Scholl
Respondent:
Rachel Thompson, Michael Carvajal and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hussain v. Thompson et al
as 3:2021cv01635
Petitioner:
Sushovan Hussain
Respondent:
Rachel Thompson, Michael Carvajal and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
