Cases 21 - 30 of 268
VANLOAN v. THE NATION OF ISLAM et al
as 2:2020cv06112
Defendant:
DAVID VALENTIN, VICTOR MOYAO, MICHELLE MONREAL and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN VANLOAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramirez v. Philips North America LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00769
Plaintiff:
Abran Ramirez
Defendant:
PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, Philips Holding USA, Inc., PHILIPS R.S. NORTH AMERICA, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hajati v. Spaulding et al
as 3:2022cv00282
Petitioner:
George Hajati
Respondent:
Radm S. Spaulding and Dr. Heather Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ramirez v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv00431
Plaintiff:
Marlem Tinoco Ramirez
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00400
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00399
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Ramirez v. Philips North America, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv01475
Plaintiff:
Diana Ramirez
Defendant:
PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V, PHILIPS R.S. NORTH AMERICA, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv03799
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03799
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matos-Ramirez v. Northampton County Jail et al
as 5:2021cv02976
Plaintiff:
Genesis Matos-Ramirez
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY JAIL and St. Luke's Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
