Cases 21 - 30 of 59
LaRosa v. Stellex Monitor Aerospace et al
as 1:2016cv09668
Plaintiff:
Hugo LaRosa
Defendant:
Stellex Monitor Aerospace, Turley, Redmond, Rosasco and Rosasco, LLP and Bernard Rawlings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rawls v. Rosenfield
as 9:2016cv00582
Plaintiff:
Rickey Rawls
Defendant:
Joshua Rosenfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv02513
Defendant:
101st Precinct, City of New York and Police Officer Rawle Persad
Plaintiff:
Abdul Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Hassell et al
as 1:2015cv05277
Petitioner:
Rawl D Davis
Respondent:
Chief/Warden Scott Hassell, Jeh C. Johnson, Field Director David Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Papetti et al v. Rawlings Financial Services, LLc et al
as 1:2015cv02933
Plaintiff:
Anthony Papetti
Defendant:
John Does 1-25 and Rawlings Financial Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Real News Project, Inc. v. Sanford Dickert et al
as 1:2015cv00365
Plaintiff:
Real News Project, Inc.
Defendant:
Sanford Dickert , Rawlings Atlantic Incorporated and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
De Biase et al v. Lexington Insurance Company
as 2:2014cv02418
Plaintiff:
Nicholas R. De Biase and Lucian R. Rawls
Defendant:
Lexington Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Rawle v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2014cv02321
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Kyon Ainsworth Rawle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Wilson v. The United States Securities and Exchange Commission et al
as 1:2014cv01739
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Wilson
Defendant:
Steven G. Rawlings and Megan R. Genet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rawlings v. Pfizer Inc.
as 1:2014cv01169
Plaintiff:
Deborah Rawlings
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
