Cases 21 - 30 of 204
Evans v. Watson et al
as 3:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
Raymond Evans
Defendant:
Jamie Watson, Brandon Purnell and Logan Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Greenwood Motor Lines Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00007
Plaintiff:
Tamara Lavon Williams and Mike Raymond Brown
Defendant:
Greenwood Motor Lines, Inc and Christopher Lee Zatezalo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr
Hughes et al v. UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
Marion E. Hughes, Raymond S. Batts, James A. Crume and others
Defendant:
UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc. and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 eb
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00643
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Wimbush et al v. Carter et al
as 5:2021cv00154
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lewis Wimbush and Cowboy Dan's Trading Post & Pawn Shop
Defendant:
Detective Carter and Oak Grove Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNichols v. Sexton et al
as 0:2021cv00073
Plaintiff:
Charles Raymond McNichols
Defendant:
J. Sexton, Tyra Hughes, Sommea James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNichols v. Sexton et al
as 3:2021cv00550
Plaintiff:
Charles Raymond McNichols
Defendant:
J. Sexton, Tyra Hughes, Sommea James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Higgs v. Thorpe
as 4:2021cv00066
Defendant:
Bo Thorpe
Plaintiff:
James Raymond Higgs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kliessendorff et al v. Nelson County Jail et al
as 3:2021cv00425
Plaintiff:
Dennis Wayne Kliessendorff, M.A.K., A.R.K. and others
Defendant:
Nelson County Jail, Nelson County Sherriff's, Nelson County Taskforce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00006
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
