Cases 21 - 30 of 68
Jones v. Veasy et al
as 1:2019cv10916
Defendant:
Zelda Releford, Regenia Veasy, Cathy M. Garrett and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Jones
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv01089
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bellis vs. Snyder et al
as 2:2018cv11289
Plaintiff:
McFadden Bellis , M C.1. , Eyondra McFadden and others
Petitioner:
Arnett Rison, III and A.1 R.IV.
Defendant:
Richard Dale Snyder , City of Flint , Receivership Transition Advisory Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Releford et al v. Mandala Healing Center, LLC et al
as 9:2017cv80970
Plaintiff:
Lydia Releford , Lake Howard , Crystal Brickhouse and others
Defendant:
Mandala Healing Center, LLC, Behavioral Health Innovations, LLC, Peter L. Walstrom and others
Receiver:
Virginia E. Winn
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Benjamin v. Right Path Transportation Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00457
Plaintiff:
Xavier Benjamin
Defendant:
Right Path Transportation Inc., Right Path Behavioral Health Services, LLC , Don Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00559
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00460
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
James B Releford v. Suzanne M Perry
as 2:2016cv07050
Respondent:
Suzanne M Perry
Petitioner:
James B Releford
Rucker et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00856
Plaintiff:
Andrea Rucker , Frank Roberts , Richard Tabler and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
