Cases 21 - 30 of 88
Richardson v. Kellogg's et al
as 2:2014cv02372
Plaintiff:
Clydell Richardson
Defendant:
Kellogg's and Mary Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Richardson v. General Motors
as 2:2014cv02351
Plaintiff:
Sherman D. Richardson
Defendant:
General Motors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hoover v. Wilson County Board of County Commissioners
as 5:2013cv04151
Defendant:
Wilson County Board of County Commissioners , Russ Walker , Jim Richardson and others
Plaintiff:
Kent Hoover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Richardson (ID 56086) v. Kansas Department of Corrections
as 5:2013cv03117
Petitioner:
Meka R. Richardson
Respondent:
Kansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Soboroff v. Richardson et al
as 5:2013cv03082
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Soboroff
Defendant:
Shelton Richardson, (fnu) Scrivner, K. Klem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Soboroff v. Scrivner et al
as 5:2013cv03081
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Soboroff
Defendant:
(fnu) Scrivner, K. Klem, (fnu) Spears and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mackovich v. Richardson et al
as 5:2013cv03064
Petitioner:
John Vincent Mackovich
Respondent:
(fnu) Richardson, Eric Holder and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
United States of America v. Richardson et al
as 5:2013cv04038
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Valerie Reigh Richardson, Patrick Lee Richardson and Arvest Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Cooper v. Richardson et al
as 5:2013cv03056
Petitioner:
Christopher J. Cooper
Respondent:
(fnu) Richardson and FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sexual Harrassment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
