Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Clay v. Epps et al
as 3:2009cv00318
Plaintiff:
Louis J. Clay
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Moncree Allen, Mary R. Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roach v. Hargett
as 1:2008cv00281
Petitioner:
Eric Roach
Respondent:
Ed Hargett
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Speck et al v. DeSoto County, Mississippi et al
as 2:2008cv00095
Plaintiff:
Carrie Allen Speck, Carrie Allen Speck, Carrie Allen Speck and others
Defendant:
DeSoto County, Mississippi, James Albert Riley, Jane Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gaston v. Roach et al
as 4:2008cv00038
Plaintiff:
James Gaston
Defendant:
Roosevelt Roach, "Unknown" William and Greenwood Police Department
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Roach v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2008cv00068
Plaintiff:
Antha D. Roach
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Hogan v. Epps et al
as 3:2007cv00616
Plaintiff:
Brian F. Hogan
Defendant:
Chrisopher Epps, E. L. Sparkman, Ricky Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Epps et al
as 4:2007cv00144
Plaintiff:
Tommy Jackson
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Emmit Sparkman, Lawrence Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation v. Roach et al
as 3:2007cv00369
Plaintiff:
Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation
Defendant:
John Gordon Roach and Gerald M. McMillan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
American Pioneer Investments, Inc. v. Roach et al
as 3:2007cv00365
Plaintiff:
American Pioneer Investments, Inc.
Defendant:
John Gordon Roach, Jr. and Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Roach v. Jenkins et al
as 3:2007cv00198
Plaintiff:
Timothy Roach
Defendant:
Lepher Jenkins, Lepher Jenkins and Lepher Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
