Cases 21 - 30 of 173
Robbins Bros. Jewelry, Inc. v. Icebox Diamond & Watches, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00505
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Rose Myers and Icebox Diamond & Watches, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robbins Bros. Jewelry, Inc.
J.A. LANIER & ASSOCIATES, INC. v. AMERICAN LANDMARK MANAGEMENT, LLC f/k/a ROBBINS ELECTRA MANAGEMENT, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00390
Plaintiff:
J.A. LANIER & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Defendant:
Christine DEFILIPPIS and AMERICAN LANDMARK MANAGEMENT, LLC f/k/a ROBBINS ELECTRA MANAGEMENT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDavid v. Smith Unit et al
as 5:2021cv00018
Plaintiff:
Roy Lynn McDavid
Defendant:
Ranking Officers, Smith Unit, Deputy Clerk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robbins v. Intercontinental Terminals Company, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00148
Defendant:
Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc., NSK PRECISION AMERICA, INC., THE UNLAUB COMPANY, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Miles Robbins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Robbins Sr v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2020cv00982
Petitioner:
Romont L Robbins Sr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01378
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv03953
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Ellis v. Hierholzer et al
as 5:2020cv01246
Plaintiff:
John Rogers Ellis
Defendant:
Scott Monroe, W.R. "Rusty" Hierholzer, Robbin Burlew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01036
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Robbin Minica v. Signify North America Corporation
as 5:2020cv00444
Plaintiff:
Robbin Minica
Defendant:
SIGNIFY NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
