Cases 21 - 30 of 54
Mitchell v. The Attorney Network, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv10574
Plaintiff:
Ron Mitchell
Defendant:
The Attorney Network, LLC, The Attorney Network Asset Recovery Group, LLC, Mark Weiner and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Komari v. Tufts University Office of Trustees et al
as 1:2015cv13941
Plaintiff:
Ravi Kumar Komari
Defendant:
Tufts University Office of Trustees , Linda Ross , W. Ron Dehaven and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schmidt et al v. Hearst Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv13039
Plaintiff:
Ron Schmidt and Loose Leashes by Ron Schmidt, LLC
Defendant:
Hearst Corporation and Ainsworth Pet Nutrition, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
In Re Attorney Disciplinary Proceedings
as 1:2015mc91207
Movant:
Robert M. Farrell
Respondent:
Ron Meyers
Briggs et al v. Liberty Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv12869
Plaintiff:
Tracey Briggs and Ron Briggs
Defendant:
Liberty Industries, Inc. and Unifirst Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv11054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv11970
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv11827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv40014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Anderson et al v. Heffernan et al
as 1:2012cv12173
Plaintiff:
Ron Anderson and Anderson Mobile Estates, Inc.
Defendant:
Mary Elizabeth Heffernan and Michele M. Leonhart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
