Cases 21 - 30 of 199
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
HESTAND v. Office of the Inspector General et al
as 6:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
JAMON HESTAND
Defendant:
Office of the Inspector General, Officer Curtis D. Bitz, Officer Candace Stevick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv04168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
RAG Process, LLC v. Garland et al
as 4:2021cv04048
Plaintiff:
RAG Process, LLC
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Rosemary Melville and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Sjoberg v. United Airlines, Inc.
as 4:2021cv03471
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Sjoberg
Defendant:
United Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Ruiz-Ramirez v. El Chalala, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00125
Plaintiff:
Irma Ruiz-Ramirez
Defendant:
El Chalala, Inc., Rosemary Gonzalez and Mark Anthony Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Raven Software Solutions Inc v. USCIS et al
as 3:2021cv02212
Plaintiff:
Raven Software Solutions Inc
Defendant:
USCIS, Ur M Jaddou, Rosemary Melville and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7422
Payne et al v. Clay County, Texas et al
as 7:2021cv00080
Plaintiff:
Jessica Payne and Carolyn Stewart
Defendant:
Clay County, Texas, Allyson Forbins, Rosemary Klepper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keitt et al v. Landstar Inway, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv02060
Defendant:
Jorge Alberto Jacquez, Sr, Landstar Inway, Inc. and Simon Abaka Anthony
Plaintiff:
Tamara Keitt and Rosemary Villanueva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
