Cases 21 - 30 of 1,444
Hernandez v. Bexar County
as 5:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Roy Hernandez, Jr
Defendant:
Bexar County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00885
Petitioner:
Roy Dean Smith
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith et al v. Bay City Realty et al
as 3:2023cv00396
Plaintiff:
Kristina Nicole Smith, James Spencer Smith, Scarlett Esme Smith and others
Defendant:
Bay City Realty, Sherry Williams, Oliver W. Roy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4001 National Insurance Flood Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00074
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Duncan v. Randall County Detention Center et al
as 5:2023cv00295
Plaintiff:
James Daniel Duncan and James Duncan
Defendant:
Randall County Detention Center, FNU Campbell, FNU LNU 5:23-CV-295 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Huffman
as 4:2023cv04630
Plaintiff:
Samuel Roy Jackson
Defendant:
Joan Huffman
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Adams v. Oliver et al
as 1:2023cv00406
Plaintiff:
Joe Daniel Adams
Defendant:
Lori Oliver, Roy Bailey, Aaron Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Securus Tech, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
Roy Jackson
Defendant:
Securus Tech, LLC, Roxanna LNU and FNU LNU 1:23-cv-211
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Collier et al
as 4:2023cv03950
Plaintiff:
Roy Jackson
Defendant:
Byran Collier, Oscar Mendoza, The TDCJ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morariu v. Chapman et al
as 1:2023cv01251
Plaintiff:
CHARLOTTE MORARIU
Defendant:
STEVE CHAPMAN, MATTHEW RABINOWITZ, ROY BAYNES and others
Nominal Defendant:
NATERA, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
