Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Heap et al v. Hagel et al
as 1:2014cv01490
Plaintiff:
Jason Daniel Heap and The Humanist Society
Defendant:
Charles T. Hagel , Raymond E. Mabus, Jr. , William F. Moran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Charles v. Rutherford et al
as 1:2014cv01196
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Charles
Defendant:
Rutherford, Gibbs, Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
American Southern Insurance Company v. Rutherford et al
as 5:2012cv00114
Plaintiff:
American Southern Insurance Company
Defendant:
Allen Troy Rutherford and Pamela I. Rutherford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Rutherford v. Price et al
as 7:2012cv00445
Defendant:
Berenstein, Brenda Justus, Lt. Patrick and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Rutherford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whalen v. Rutherford et al
as 3:2012cv00032
Defendant:
Shelley Beckwith Daniel, Does 1-5, Inclusive, James Larry Rutherford and others
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline M. Whalen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Crowell v. Lanteigne et al
as 2:2010cv00471
Plaintiff:
Eric Raymond Crowell
Defendant:
Paul J. Lanteigne, J. B. Manigo and J. Rutherford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. O'Brien, et al
as 7:2009cv00165
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Johnson
Defendant:
T. O'Brien, Wilson, Lieutenant Trees and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Rutherford v. Stansbury
as 1:2008cv01173
Petitioner:
Lionell Rutherford
Respondent:
Patricia Stansbury
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Harrison v. Landeizne et al
as 1:2008cv00941
Plaintiff:
Sidney N. Harrison
Defendant:
Paul Landeizne, Johnthan Mannen, Jennings and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rutherford v. Stansbury et al
as 1:2008cv00723
Petitioner:
Lionell Rutherford
Respondent:
Patricia Stansbury and Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
