Cases
Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Byron L. Scott v. Larry Small et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2010cv00492
Respondent: Joseph Gaetano, San Bernardino Superior Court and Larry Small
Petitioner: Byron L Scott
Greg Fairchild v. Douglas Fettel et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2009cv00549
Plaintiff: Greg Fairchild
Defendant: Douglas Fettel, Lana Langlolis, County of San Bernardino Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marc Endsley v. USDC-CAC
as 08-73271
: In re: MARC ANTHONY LOWELL ENDSLEY
Petitioner: MARC ANTHONY LOWELL ENDSLEY
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest: SAN BERNARDINO SUPERIOR COURT, THE CALIFORNIA COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT and CALIFORNIA STATE SUPREME COURT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00952
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Orlando Rosa Rodriguez v. San Bernardino Superior Court et al
as 5:2008cv00836
Petitioner: Orlando Rosa Rodriguez
Respondent: San Bernardino Superior Court and J F Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Larry Parker v. San Bernardino Superior Court
as 2:2008cv03864
Petitioner: Larry Dale Parker
Respondent: San Bernardino Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Liggins v. Consumer Consultant Network et al
as 2:2008cv02343
Plaintiff: Orienthal D Liggins
Defendant: Consumer Consultant Network, San Bernardino Superior Court, San Bernardino County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Orienthal D Liggins v. San Bernardino Superior Court
as 5:2007cv00461
Petitioner: Orienthal D Liggins
Respondent: San Bernardino Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?