Cases 21 - 30 of 54
HOYE v. SCI SOMERSET MEDICAL DEPT.
as 3:2021cv00026
Plaintiff:
NATHAN HOYE
Defendant:
SCI SOMERSET MEDICAL DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BROWN v. SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI-SOMERSET et al
as 2:2020cv01895
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE, SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI-SOMERSET and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF FAYETTE COUNTY
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER WILEY BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. Superintendent of SCI-Somerset et al
as 3:2020cv01202
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and Superintendent of SCI-Somerset
Petitioner:
Christopher Wiley Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BROWNE v. SCI SOMERSET et al
as 3:2020cv00021
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA BROWNE
Defendant:
SCI SOMERSET, E. TICE and DR. SMUCKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BROWNE v. SCI SOMERSET et al
as 2:2019cv06015
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA BROWNE
Defendant:
SCI SOMERSET, E. TICE and DR. SMUCKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHAMBERS v. WARDEN, SCI-SOMERSET
as 2:2019cv05894
Petitioner:
KAREEM CHAMBERS
Respondent:
WARDEN, SCI-SOMERSET
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BARNES v. MEDVA et al
as 3:2019cv00202
Defendant:
SCI SOMERSET SECURITY DEPT., LT. LINDSEY, CO GIBSON and others
Plaintiff:
BRANDON DANTE BARNES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JONES v. SCI SOMERSET et al
as 2:2019cv00871
Respondent:
SCI SOMERSET, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY
Petitioner:
JONATHAN PAUL JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COOL v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA et al
as 1:2019cv00145
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA, WARDEN, SCI SOMERSET and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ERIE
Petitioner:
JEREMY A. COOL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
STERN v. SCI SOMERSET OFFICERS
as 3:2019cv00068
Plaintiff:
NIE-JEN STERN
Defendant:
SCI SOMERSET OFFICERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
