Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 62
Florida Wildlife Federation In, et al v. Administrator, U.S. Environmen, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-10987
Plaintiff - Appellant: FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION INC, SIERRA CLUB, INC., ENVIRONMENTAL CONFEDERATION OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee: ADMINISTRATOR, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
: SERVICE
Sierra Club Inc v Ameren Energy Resources Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv03408
Plaintiff: Sierra Club Inc
Defendant: Ameren Energy Resources Company and Futuregen Industrial Alliance Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7401
Natural Resources Defense Council et al v. Ameren Energy Resources Company LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01181
Plaintiff: Natural Resources Defense Council , Environmental Law & Policy Center , Respiratory Health Association and others
Defendant: Ameren Energy Resources Company LLC and Ameren Energy Resources Generating Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604 Clear Air Act (Emission Standards)
Sierra Club, et al v. Bostick, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-6201
Plaintiff - Appellant: SIERRA CLUB, INC., CLEAN ENERGY FUTURE OKLAHOMA and EAST TEXAS SUB REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION
Defendant - Appellee: THOMAS P. BOSTICK, in his official capacity as Commanding General and Chief of Engineers of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, MICHAEL J. WALSH, in his official capacity as U.S. Army Commanding General for Civil and Emergency Operations, MICHAEL TEAGUE, in his official capacity as Tulsa District Commander of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and others
Intervenor: TRANSCANADA KEYSTONE PIPELINE LP, TRANSCANADA CORPORATION, INTERSTATE NATURAL GAS ASSOCIATION and others
In Re: Sierra Club, Inc., et al
as 12-1860
Petitioner: SIERRA CLUB, INC. and OUR CHILDREN'S EARTH FOUNDATION
Respondent: U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Sierra Club Inc et al v. Bostick et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2012cv00742
Plaintiff: Sierra Club Inc , Clean Energy Future Oklahoma and East Texas Sub Regional Planning Commission
Defendant: Thomas P Bostick , Michael J Walsh , Michael Teague and others
Intervenor: TransCanada Keystone Pipeline LP and TransCanada Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY PROJECT et al v. JACKSON
as 1:2012cv00867
Plaintiff: ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY PROJECT , SIERRA CLUB, INC. and TEXAS CAMPAIGN FOR THE ENVIRONMENT
Defendant: LISA P. JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604
Sierra Club, Inc. et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency,et.al.
as 1:2012cv10902
Plaintiff: Sierra Club, Inc. and Our Children's Earth Foundation, Inc.
Defendant: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Lisa Jackson and Curt Spalding
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Gulf Restoration Network, Inc., et al v. Administrator, U.S. Environmen, et al
as 12-12119
Plaintiff / Appellant: FLORIDA ELECTRIC POWER COORDINATING GROUP, INC., FLORIDA WATER ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATION UTILITY COUNCIL, CITY OF PANAMA CITY, FLORIDA and others
Not Classified By Court: SERVICE
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, FLORIDA FERTILIZER & AGRICHEMICAL ASSOCIATION, THE FERTILIZER INSTITUTE and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION, INC., THE MOSAIC COMPANY, INC., FLORIDA PULP & PAPER ASSOCIATION ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS and others
Amicus Curiae: FLORIDA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND ASSOCIATED INDUSTRIES OF FLORIDA
Moapa Band of Paiutes, et al v. BLM, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-17672
Plaintiff - Appellant: MOAPA BAND OF PAIUTES and SIERRA CLUB, INC.
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, KEN SALAZAR and RONALD WENKER
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee: NEVADA POWER COMPANY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?