Cases 21 - 30 of 111
Simpson v. Lafayette Police Dept. et al
as 4:2021cv00036
Defendant:
Zambone, Lafayette Police Dept. and Lafayette City of
Plaintiff:
Timothy E Simpson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMPSON v. APEX EXPRESS, INC.
as 1:2021cv00744
Plaintiff:
Robert Simpson
Defendant:
Apex Express, Inc. d/b/a Cordell Transportation Company, LLC and APEX EXPRESS, INC. doing business as CORDELL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
SIMPSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv00154
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
DOMINQUE SIMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Simpson v. Bustamante, et. al.
as 2:2021cv00050
Plaintiff:
CAROLINA SIMPSON
Defendant:
ESTEBAN F. BUSTAMANTE, WERNER ENTERPRISES, INC. and Esteban F Bustamante
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SIMPSON v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv06177
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK GROUP INCORPORATED, COOK INCORPORATED and others
Plaintiff:
ERNETTA SIMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WESTFIELD et al v. SIMPSON et al
as 1:2020cv01747
Defendant:
OFFICER JOHN DOE 3, OFFICER JOHN DOE 2, OFFICER JOHN DOE 4 and others
Plaintiff:
IVORE WESTFIELD and RACHEL HARDING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMPSON v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv01582
Plaintiff:
DOUG JAMES SIMPSON and DOUGLAS JAMES SIMPSON
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
SIMPSON v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv01403
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH R. SIMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FUNCHES v. PATTERSON et al
as 3:2020cv00066
Defendant:
WILLIAM SIMPSON, EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOSHUA PATTERSON and others
Plaintiff:
ELTON FUNCHES, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00102
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
