Cases 21 - 30 of 1,886
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00394
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Rawls v. Huffman et al
as 1:2024cv00197
Defendant:
Unknown Hicks, Unknown Robinson, Brand Huffman and others
Plaintiff:
Stanley Ellis Rawls
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith, Jr. v. Cain et al
as 5:2024cv00064
Defendant:
Soila Cotton, Cody Bealer, Burl Cain and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
William Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lin-Con Marine Recovery LLC v. Conmaco/Rector LP et al
as 1:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Lin-Con Marine Recovery LLC
Defendant:
S/V Sugar Magnolia, Conmaco/Rector LP and Duane P. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
United States of America v. Smith
as 3:2024cv00174
Defendant:
Sandy Frieson Smith
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Smith v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2024cv00334
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Smith v. City of McComb City Police Department
as 5:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Markez Delmont Smith
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
City of McComb City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00051
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Bauer v. Smith
as 3:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Ty K. Bauer
Defendant:
Kent Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
