Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Saunders v. Margaritaville of Myrtle Beach LLC
as 4:2016cv01559
Plaintiff:
William K Saunders
Defendant:
Margaritaville of Myrtle Beach LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Saunders v. U.S. Marshall Service
as 1:2016cv01149
Petitioner:
Ted Wayne Saunders
Respondent:
U.S. Marshall Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Saunders v. Brunson
as 5:2016cv00229
Plaintiff:
Danny Eugene Saunders
Defendant:
Joyce Brunson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saunders v. Hicks et al
as 5:2015cv04438
Plaintiff:
Danny Eugene Saunders
Defendant:
Officer Hicks, Officer James, Officer Jennings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saunders et al v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2014cv04447
Plaintiff:
Wanda S Saunders and Brian Saunders
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Estate of Kelvin C. Dozier v. CSX Transportation, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv03921
Plaintiff:
Estate of Kelvin C. Dozier
Defendant:
CSX Transportation Inc and Steven Kay Saunders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Deberah Rivington et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2014cv02304
Plaintiff:
Deberah Rivington, Mary Stallings, Dianna Walker and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc, McKesson Corporation and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cobb et al v. State of South Carolina et al
as 2:2013cv02370
Plaintiff:
Mark Cobb and Malcolm Saunders
Defendant:
State of South Carolina, South Carolina Department of Corrections, Berkeley County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Medlock v. Reebok International LTD et al
as 9:2013cv01833
Plaintiff:
Lisbeth Saunders Medlock
Defendant:
Reebok International LTD and ICON Health and Fitness Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Saunders v. Mitchell et al
as 2:2012cv02152
Plaintiff:
Edward Harold Saunders, Jr
Defendant:
Mary M Mitchell, Esther Slater and G Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
