Cases 21 - 30 of 49
Deaton v. Scott County Jail et al
as 4:2019cv00171
Respondent:
Scott County Jail, Sheriff Lane and Lane
Petitioner:
Jack H. Deaton
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Simpson v. Scott County Jail et al
as 1:2018cv00031
Plaintiff:
John Lee Simpson
Defendant:
Scott County Jail, Wes Drury, Paxton Ayres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lattanzio v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 5:2017cv00501
Plaintiff:
James Lattanzio
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Scott County, Commonwealth of Kentucky, Scott County Police, Commonwealth of Kentucky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Levy v. Scott County Jail
as 4:2017cv00365
Plaintiff:
David Lee Levy , Jr
Defendant:
Scott County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fogle v. Scott County Jail
as 4:2017cv00261
Plaintiff:
David Dale Fogle
Defendant:
Scott County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spooner v. Scott County Jail et al
as 4:2017cv00162
Plaintiff:
Nathan Matthew Spooner
Defendant:
Scott County Jail and David Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fishburn v. Bettendorf Iowa Police Department et al
as 4:2017cv00025
Plaintiff:
Neil Anthony Fishburn
Defendant:
Bettendorf Iowa Police Department, City of Bettendorf, Scott County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Applewhite v. Scott County Jail et al
as 1:2016cv00282
Plaintiff:
Gailon Lamarous Applewhite
Defendant:
Scott County Jail, Unknown Ward, Unknown Misty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vearnest McClellan v. Scott County Jail, et al
as 16-3637
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Vearnest Papoose McClellan
Defendant - Appellee:
Scott County Jail, Predo, Kitchen Supervisor and Trish Doe, Medical Department
McClellan v. Scott County Jail et al
as 4:2016cv00255
Plaintiff:
Vearnest Papoose McClellan
Defendant:
Scott County Jail, Predo and Trish Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
