Cases 21 - 30 of 78
Goldstein v. Martin Cetron et al
as 8:2018cv02400
Defendant:
US Marshalls-SD, Avera McKinron, Columbia Corrective Care and others
Plaintiff:
David Scott Goldstein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Goldstein v. Center for Disease Control et al
as 8:2018cv01218
Plaintiff:
David Goldstein
Defendant:
Center for Disease Control, Martin S. Cetron, Beth Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2018cv00782
Plaintiff:
Dameon Shaw
Defendant:
State of Maryland, Brandon Echevarria, Dexter Nazareno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anne Arundel County, Maryland v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018cv00519
Plaintiff:
Anne Arundel County, Maryland
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Pharma, Inc., The Purdue Frederick Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Goldstein v. Center for Disease Control et al
as 8:2018cv00444
Plaintiff:
David Scott Goldstein
Defendant:
Center for Disease Control, Beth Bell and Fredrick Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv01822
Plaintiff:
Kayshawn G. Shaw
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1381
Mills v. Shaw et al
as 1:2017cv01711
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jerome Mills
Defendant:
Cecelia Shaw, Keefe Supply Company and Keefe Reginal Service Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Giles et al
as 8:2017cv01699
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Shaw
Defendant:
Charles Giles, K. Barney and Corrections Officers at C.B.I.F.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company et al
as 8:2017cv01458
Plaintiff:
Linwood O. Shaw
Defendant:
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company , William Pitt, Gun Mill Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Shaw v. MV Transportation, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01268
Plaintiff:
Dollie Ann Shaw
Defendant:
MV Transportation, Inc. and ACE American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
