Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 21 - 30 of 35
PEARSON v. DWENGER et al
as 2:2019cv00622
Plaintiff: PEARSON DOUGLAS and DOUGLAS PEARSON
Defendant: DWENGER, SIMMS and PRIMEAU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEARSON v. DWENGER et al
as 4:2019cv00285
Defendant: PRIMEAU, DWENGER and SIMMS
Plaintiff: PEARSON DOUGLAS and DOUGLAS PEARSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEARSON v. SIMMS et al
as 2:2019cv00606
Plaintiff: DOUGLAS PEARSON
Defendant: DR DWENGER and DR SIMMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. Simms et al
as 1:2019cv00519
Plaintiff: Douglas Pearson
Defendant: Dr Dwenger and Dr Simms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH et al v. SAINT PAUL TRAVELERS COMPANY INC. et al
as 1:2019cv00598
Defendant: BOB STELLER, MOBILE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT INC., EDDIE CURRAN and others
Plaintiff: EDMOND HUDMOND SMITH, IV and LOUIS HOLGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SIMMS v. TEXAS ROADHOUSE, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv00037
Plaintiff: JAMES W. SIMMS, III
Defendant: TEXAS ROADHOUSE, INC. and THE MILLARD GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DAVIS et al v. EVANS DELIVERY COMPANY, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv00481
Plaintiff: BABETTE BROWN and ROSE DAVIS
Defendant: COSCO CONTAINER LINES, AMEERICAN, INC., EVANS DELIVERY COMPANY, INC. and DOUGLAS E. SIMMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00575
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Flatford v. Simm Associates, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00467
Plaintiff: Peggy Flatford
Defendant: Simm Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ADKINS et al v. WALGREEN CO. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01593
Plaintiff: BRIAN ADKINS, KIPP BARHYDT, MICHAEL BARRETT and others
Defendant: WALGREEN CO.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?