Cases 21 - 30 of 99
Gill v. AGK Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2021mi00098
Plaintiff:
Manjit Singh Gill and Manjit Singh
Defendant:
AGK Enterprises, Inc. and Kuljinder Singh
CONE v. SOBATPREET et al
as 5:2021cv00349
Plaintiff:
SHYKEMMIA CONE
Defendant:
SINGH SOBATPREET, 2111606 ALBERTA LTD DBA TRANSKING TRUCKING, INTACT FINANCIAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Huddle House, Inc. v. Austin Foodmart, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv02640
Defendant:
Austin Foodmart, Inc., Inderjeet Sachdeva and Jasvir Singh
Plaintiff:
Huddle House, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Singh v. DeKalb County School District
as 1:2021cv02403
Plaintiff:
Rajnish Singh
Defendant:
DeKalb County School District
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Lester v. Maitland et al
as 1:2021cv00562
Defendant:
Maitland Trucking, LLC, Simarpal Singh Individually and as Agent and Employee of doing business as JES LLC doing business as Load X Transport, LLC, Progressive Premier Insurance Company of IL and others
Plaintiff:
Courtney Lester
Cross Defendant:
Simarpal Singh and JES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SINGH v. DIXIT
as 7:2020cv00245
Petitioner:
ROSE SINGH
Respondent:
AKASH DIXIT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Inhale, Inc. v. Inhale Smoke Shop and Lounge et al
as 1:2020cv04817
Defendant:
Jasbir Singh Chahal, Inhale Smoke Shop and Lounge and Sam Chahal
Plaintiff:
Inhale, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Davis v. Singh et al
as 1:2020cv04217
Plaintiff:
Madison M. Davis
Defendant:
Keen Trucking, LLC and Kamaljeet Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DIXIT v. DIXIT
as 7:2020cv00124
Defendant:
AKASH DIXIT
Plaintiff:
TANYA SINGH DIXIT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2020cv00118
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
