Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Lanier v. Sizemore, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00072
Defendant:
Mr. Allen Davis, Sizemore, Inc., Mr. Sheldon L. Langford and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Lanier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SIZEMORE et al v. GRAYHAWK HOMES INC et al
as 4:2017cv00161
Defendant:
GRAYHAWK HOMES INC and DAVID B ERICKSON
Plaintiff:
JAMES ELLIS BURDITT, II, JAMES SAMUEL MITCHELL, AARON MATTHEW SOVERN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hammitt v. Hall et al
as 5:2017cv00064
Plaintiff:
Dewel Hammitt
Defendant:
Hilton Hall, Ricky Stone, Sizemore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. BARNES et al
as 1:2015cv00168
Plaintiff:
TYRONE THOMPSON
Defendant:
RUSS FLOYD BARNES, KEVIN DUVANE and W JAMES SIZEMORE, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. BARNES et al
as 1:2015cv00169
Plaintiff:
TYRONE J THOMPSON
Defendant:
RUSS BARNES, KEVIN DUVANE and W JAMES SIZEMORE, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MITCHELL v. SIZEMORE et al
as 5:2014cv00238
Petitioner:
MARLON MITCHELL
Respondent:
W JAMES SIZEMORE, JR, MARCIA G SHEIN and NATHAN DEAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kelsey v. Macon Judicial Circuit et al
as 1:2013cv00924
Plaintiff:
Kameron Kelsey
Defendant:
Macon Judicial Circuit, Macon Police Department, State of Georgia and others
Hunter v. D.A. Association of GA et al
as 1:2013cv00735
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Hunter
Defendant:
D.A. Association of GA, Comm. on Access and Fairness in Courts, Wendy Shoob and others
Heard v. Georgia Legislature et al
as 1:2012cv02533
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
Georgia Legislature, Superior Court of Clayton County, Superior Court of Bibb County and others
Movant:
James E. Harris, Jamall D. Mathis, Antonio Battle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Day et al v. Sizemore et al
as 1:2010cv00176
Plaintiff:
Justin M. Day
Defendant:
Superior Court Judge Sizemore, Jim Thurman, Reggie D. Rachals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
