Cases 21 - 30 of 211
Spicer v. Bradley
as 3:2018cv02088
Petitioner:
Deonte Spicer
Respondent:
Sergeant Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Spicer v. Bradley
as 4:2018cv02088
Petitioner:
Deonte Spicer
Respondent:
Sergeant Bradley and Warden Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WEBB et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv04380
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER JEFFREY WALKER, POLICE OFFICER MICHAEL SPICER, POLICE OFFICER LINWOOD NORMAN and others
Plaintiff:
KAREM WEBB, JAMAL WEBB and DWIGHT TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv03646
Plaintiff:
TONY JACKSON
Defendant:
BETTS, THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOES #1-4 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EDWARDS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv03426
Plaintiff:
JAY EDWARD and JAY EDWARDS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL SPICER, CITY POLICE DEPT. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PYGATT v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv03372
Defendant:
OFFICER MICHAEL SPICER, OFFICER THOMAS LICIARDELLO, OFFICER PERRY BETTS and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY PYGATT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCONNELL v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv02557
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MCCONNELL
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL SPICER, PERRY BETTS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01882
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MILLER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv01443
Plaintiff:
LAMONT MILLER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL SPICER, PERRY BETTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCMULLIN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA LAW DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2018cv01190
Plaintiff:
JOANNE MCMULLIN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA LAW DEPARTMENT, MICHAEL SPICER , PERRY BETTS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
