Cases
Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2014cv03892
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Denise Cage, et al v. USDC-WAWSE
as 14-71779
: In re: DENISE MARIE CAGE and RYAN KING
Petitioner: DENISE MARIE CAGE, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and RYAN KING, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Real Party In Interest: CACH LLC, a Colorado Limited Liability Company, KIRKLAND LAW GROUP PLLC, a Washington Professional Limited Liability Company, R. JEFF WADE, a Washington Debt Collection Attorney (WSBA No. 33679) and others
COX et al v. CA HOLDING INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01754
Plaintiff: ROBERT BROWN, LUCINDA COX, DEVIN HARLEY and others
Defendant: CA HOLDING INC., CACH LLC, CACH OF NJ LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv01741
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ruple v. Law Offices of Michael K. Sipes et al
as 3:2013cv01962
Plaintiff: Dennis Ruple
Defendant: Law Offices of Michael K. Sipes, Cach, LLC and Squaretwo Financial Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02247
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
RICHARDS v. SQUARETWO FINANCIAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv03408
Plaintiff: JANINE RICHARDS
Defendant: SQUARETWO FINANCIAL CORPORATION and HARRISON ROSS BYCK, ESQ., PC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?