Cases 21 - 30 of 21,177
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Smith-El v. Michigan, State of et al
as 5:2024cv11370
Plaintiff:
Sheik D. Smith-El
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Dana Nessel, Detroit Land Bank Authority and others
Davis v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 2:2024cv11354
Plaintiff:
Michael Davis
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Borrego Energy, LLC v. Pullman Solar, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00524
Plaintiff:
Borrego Energy, LLC f/k/a Borrego Solar Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Pullman Solar, LLC, sPower, LLC and United States Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Perry v. Tanner
as 1:2024cv11346
Petitioner:
Casey Hayes Perry
Respondent:
Michigan, State of and Jeff Tanner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11345
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Stoneridge at Heritage Village Condominium Association v. Hillsman et al
as 2:2024cv11329
Plaintiff:
Stoneridge at Heritage Village Condominium Association
Defendant:
Charles S. Hillsman, III and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
United States of America v. Currency $42,885.00 et al
as 2:2024cv11328
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Currency $42,885.00 and Miscellaneous Jewelry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
