Cases 21 - 30 of 10,609
Guggenbiller v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00445
Plaintiff:
Edward Guggenbiller
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Ridgway v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
Gary Ridgway
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Hofner et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 5:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Devin Hofner and Patricia Raynor
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
Dennis v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02099
Petitioner:
Antwain Lamar Dennis
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James v. United States of America
as 5:2024ct03134
Plaintiff:
Harry Sharod James
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Day v. Rich et al
as 5:2024ct03135
Plaintiff:
Roger Charles Day, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Rich, United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MCGILL v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2024cv00447
Petitioner:
MELISSA GRIFFIN MCGILL
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dorado v. United States of America
as 5:2024hc02098
Petitioner:
Carlos Dorado
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00441
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Healey v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
John Michael Healey
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
