Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Baccus v. State of South Carolina Criminal Justice System, The et al
as 9:2019cv02919
Plaintiff:
John Baccus and John Baccus Roosevelt
Defendant:
Warden Scott Lewis, Tamara Conwell, K. Conrad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Temple v. Lewis et al
as 8:2019cv02659
Plaintiff:
Dennis Temple and Dennis Maurice Temple
Defendant:
Captain Adam Bradburn, Associate Warden Susan Duffy, Lieutenant Robert Blackburn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClellan v. Duffy
as 9:2019cv01864
Plaintiff:
James Anderson McClellan
Defendant:
Associate Warden Susan Duffy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Temple v. Lewis et al
as 8:2019cv01429
Defendant:
Unknown Early, Unknown Mason, Unknown Saltsburg and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Maurice Temple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClellan v. Lewis et al
as 9:2019cv01227
Plaintiff:
James A. McClellan and James Anderson McClellan
Defendant:
Warden Scott Lewis and Associate Warden Susan Duffy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Lawter et al
as 8:2019cv00646
Plaintiff:
David Richard Walker, Jr
Defendant:
Susan Duffy, Felisha Ogunsile, Jeanette Glenn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Martin v. Susan Duffy
as 18-6333
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY FRED MARTIN
Defendant - Appellee:
SUSAN DUFFY
Martin v. Duffy
as 4:2018cv00317
Plaintiff:
Anthony Fred Martin
Defendant:
Susan Duffy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adrian Eaglin v. McCall
as 16-7171
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADRIAN T. EAGLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
MCCALL, Sergeant
Defendant:
LARRY CARTLEDGE, Warden, FLORENCE MAUNEY, Assistant Warden, CURTIS EARLLY and others
Linde et al v. Fifth Street Asset Management, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01941
Plaintiff:
Ronald K. Linde , Maxine H. Linde and Ronald and Maxine Linde Foundation
Defendant:
Fifth Street Asset Management, Inc. , Leonard M. Tannenbaum , Bernard D. Berman and others
Movant:
Kieran Duffy , Susan Duffy and Howard Greenspan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
