Cases 21 - 30 of 1,520
TAYLOR v. ROWE
as 3:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
DEVONTAI NATHANIEL TAYLOR
Defendant:
OFFICER BLAKE ROWE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. U.S. Bancorp et al
as 1:2024cv01199
Plaintiff:
Taylor L. Johnson
Defendant:
U.S. Bancorp and Truist Financial Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01588
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Taylor v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
James Lamont Taylor
Defendant:
Freedom Mortgage Corporation and McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 1:2024cv01515
Plaintiff:
Troy Taylor
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Taylor, III, Deborah R. Mangum, Leonard K. Sweatman and others
Defendant:
Piedmont Healthcare, Inc. and University Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Taylor v. Glynn County Detention Center et al
as 2:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Clinton Taylor
Defendant:
Glynn County Detention Center, Mrs. Harris and Mr. Wooten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
