Cases 21 - 30 of 920
Afiz v. Buckner
as 4:2023cv01512
Petitioner:
Abdul Hakeem Afiz and Miron Taylor
Respondent:
Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Taylor v. Kijakazi
as 6:2023cv03338
Plaintiff:
Daren Dean Taylor
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Taylor v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv03338
Plaintiff:
Daren Dean Taylor
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv03334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Kesler et al v. Tyson Foods, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00164
Plaintiff:
Gary Kesler, Rebecca Sue Kesler, Eric Kesler and others
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc., Tyson Chicken, Inc., Tyson Sales & Distribution, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Kesler et al v. Tyson Foods, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv01193
Plaintiff:
Gary Kesler, Rebecca Kesler, Eric Kesler and others
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc., Tyson Chicken, Inc., Tyson Sales & Distribution, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Lucas et al v. Taylor et al
as 4:2023cv01063
Plaintiff:
Mena Lucas, Ryleigh Bryant, Major Bryant and others
Defendant:
Unitherm Furnace, LLC, Larry Taylor and Samuel Eberhart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Martin v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv01037
Plaintiff:
Sarah Martin and Phillip Morris
Defendant:
Anne Precythe, Brian Bingaman, Christopher Sarchett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
