Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Cordova v. Dowling, et al
as 12-1364
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD L. CORDOVA
Defendant - Appellee:
RAY DOWLING, Sgt., TED LAURENCE, P.A., TEJINDER SINGH, P.A. and others
Sparks v. Singh et al
as 1:2012cv01897
Plaintiff:
Stephen Thene Sparks
Defendant:
Tejinder Singh, Lisa Hanks, Ted Lawrence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nasious v. State Of Colorado, et al
as 11-1450
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN NASIOUS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF COLORADO, Office of the Governor Bill Ritter, MARTHA MUELLER, Physician Health Partners, BARRY GOLDSMITH, Physician Health Partners and others
Burns v. Buford, et al
as 11-1318
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS BURNS
Defendant - Appellee:
STACEY BUFORD, JOHN DOE, Colorado Attorney General, R. N. WOLFF and others
Nasious v. State Of Colorado, et al
as 11-1310
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN NASIOUS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF COLORADO, Office of the Governor Bill Ritter, MARTHA MUELLER, Physician Health Partners, BARRY GOLDSMITH, Physician Health Partners and others
Burns v. Buford, et al
as 11-1260
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS BURNS
Defendant - Appellee:
STACEY BUFORD, JOHN DOE, Colorado Attorney General, R. N. WOLFF and others
Burns v. Buford et al
as 1:2010cv02691
Plaintiff:
Douglas Burns
Defendant:
Stacey Buford, Colorado Attorney General, R. N. Wolff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Eskestrand, et al
as 10-1070
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL GENE YOUNG
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS A. ESKESTRAND, M.D., ORVILLE NEUFELD, M.D., PHD., DO., R. LINDSEY LILLY, JR., M.D. and others
Estes et al v. Singh et al
as 1:2010cv00226
Plaintiff:
Nancy Estes and Kevin Estes
Defendant:
Tejinder Singh, M.D. and Albany Medical Center Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Tejinder Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 10-70180
Petitioner:
TEJINDER SINGH
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
