Cases 21 - 30 of 52
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. CITY OF LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA
as 5:2017cv05684
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Defendant:
CITY OF LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
DIETZ v. HUNSICKER et al
as 5:2017cv04870
Plaintiff:
CINDY DIETZ
Defendant:
DANIEL HUNSICKER and CITY OF LANCASTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STATON v. DICKINSON et al
as 5:2017cv03236
Plaintiff:
STERLING STATON, SR.
Defendant:
TODD M. DICKINSON, JOHN DOE and CITY OF LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. CITY OF LANCASTER et al
as 5:2017cv00019
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ANTHONY MOORE
Defendant:
CITY OF LANCASTER, BOROUGH OF EPHRATA, PETER G. SHEPPARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WIDDOWSON v. CORLL et al
as 5:2015cv03628
Plaintiff:
STEVEN WIDDOWSON
Defendant:
RAY M. CORLL and CITY OF LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUIZ v. BRADLEY et al
as 5:2015cv00049
Plaintiff:
DAMIAN RUIZ
Defendant:
BEN BRADLEY , JONATHAN REPPERT , HICKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCKINNEY v. CITY OF LANCASTER et al
as 5:2014cv06192
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCKINNEY
Defendant:
CITY OF LANCASTER , CHRISTOPHER MCCORMICK and ANTHONY WEAVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOSTETTER v. MOLYEAUX et al
as 5:2014cv04810
Plaintiff:
BRIAN HOSTETTER
Defendant:
DENNIS MOLYEAUX, DONALD BROWN, PRIME CARE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARZA v. MOLYEAUX et al
as 5:2014cv04811
Plaintiff:
EDWARD R. GARZA, JR
Defendant:
DENNIS MOLYEAUX , DONALD BROWN, PRIME CARE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DEJESUS v. CITY OF LANCASTER et al
as 5:2014cv03437
Plaintiff:
AIDA DEJESUS
Defendant:
CITY OF LANCASTER , HENRY C. BARRIE , GARY MCCRADY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
