Cases 21 - 30 of 93
McLinn et al v. Thomas County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2020cv02385
Defendant:
First State Bank of Healy, Caleb Carter, Thomas County, Kansas, Board of Commissioners and others
Plaintiff:
Kyle McLinn and Outlaw Towing & Recovery Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SLATER v. THOMAS COUNTY JAIL et al
as 7:2020cv00151
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH CHANCE SLATER
Defendant:
Officer GOOSBY, Officer TAMMY LONG, JOHNY JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POOLE v. MAXWELL et al
as 4:2019cv00213
Plaintiff:
JAMES HUNTER POOLE
Defendant:
KRISTY LEE MAXWELL, THOMAS COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, THOMAS COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POOLE v. MAXWELL et al
as 7:2019cv00209
Plaintiff:
JAMES HUNTER POOLE
Defendant:
GEORGE KORNEYY, THOMAS COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, KRISTY LEE MAXWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BASS v. WILLIAMS et al
as 7:2019cv00193
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL AARON BASS
Defendant:
THOMAS COUNTY JAIL and VIRGINIA WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEPHENS V. THOMAS COUNTY JAIL
as 7:2019cv00182
Defendant:
THOMAS COUNTY JAIL, Captain RON JAMES and Lt. VIRGINIA WILLIAMS
Plaintiff:
KELVIN STEPHENS
Respondent:
Sheriff R CARLTON POWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
POOLE v. POWELL et al
as 7:2019cv00166
Plaintiff:
JAMES HUNTER POOLE
Defendant:
RON JAMES, Officer ROLLINS, PRESTON ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephens v. Thomas County Jail
as 1:2019cv04536
Defendant:
Thomas County Jail
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAYTON v. SCHOFILL et al
as 7:2019cv00158
Defendant:
COREY SELLERS, LOUIS SCHOFILL, THOMAS COUNTY DRUG SQUAD and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES MITCHELL LAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HURST et al v. WILLIAMS et al
as 7:2019cv00135
Defendant:
THOMAS COUNTY JAIL and VIRGINIA WILLIAMS
Plaintiff:
GREG DEWAYNE HURST, MICHAEL A BASS and JACQUEZ E BUSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
