Cases 21 - 30 of 70
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv04720
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Whitehurst v. Lackawanna County et al
as 3:2017cv00903
Plaintiff:
Amir Whitehurst
Defendant:
Lackawanna County , Patrick O'Malley , James Wansacz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BERTOTHY v. ENVIRONMENTAL DRILLING SOLUTIONS, L.L.C.
as 2:2016cv01371
Plaintiff:
TRENT BERTOTHY
Defendant:
ENVIRONMENTAL DRILLING SOLUTIONS, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
WHITE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv01536
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
TRENT WHITE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
FARR v. PAC-WEST DISTRIBUTING NV LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00175
Plaintiff:
EVERETT L. FARR, III
Defendant:
PAC-WEST DISTRIBUTING NV LLC , TRENT TAYLOR and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AFAB INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC. v. ENIGMA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv04675
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2, ENIGMA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. doing business as WESTERN and others
Plaintiff:
AFAB INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Rollins v. Kerestes et al
as 3:2015cv01491
Petitioner:
Trent Rollins
Respondent:
John Kerestes , Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania , Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brewer v. Hopple et al
as 1:2015cv00942
Plaintiff:
Jesse Brewer
Defendant:
Donald E. Hopple, Jr., Trent E Buschman, Metro PCS Pennsylvania, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
