Cases 21 - 30 of 10,852
Caldwell v. Lumpkin
as 24-40361
Plaintiff:
Robert Franklin Caldwell
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Hallcy v. Lumpkin
as 24-10448
Petitioner:
Mark DeWayne Hallcy
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Clay v. Schiwart et al
as 7:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Tyrone La'Shawn Clay
Defendant:
Carl Schiwart, Jana Harrison, Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kie v. Lumpkin
as 24-40357
Petitioner:
Michael Wayne Kie
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Palmer v. Lumpkin
as 24-20215
Petitioner:
Scott Edward Palmer
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Rodriguez v. Lumpkin
as 24-50392
Petitioner:
Jesus Rodriguez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Diez v. TDCJ
as 24-40350
Plaintiff:
James Logan Diez
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, McConnell Unit Mailroom Supervisor Ms. Salles, McConnell Unit Unknown Mailroom Staff and others
Mallett v. Lumpkin
as 24-10435
Petitioner:
Michael Robert Mallett
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Wiggins v. Lumpkin
as 24-10430
Petitioner:
Herbert Lavonne Wiggins
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Kmiec v. Harris County et al
as 4:2024cv01932
Plaintiff:
Henry Kmiec
Defendant:
Harris County, University of Texas Medical Branch, Texas Department of Criminal Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
