Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Freiermuth v Thermopolis WY et al
as 1:2009cv00202
Plaintiff:
Neva Freiermuth
Defendant:
Thermopolis WY, State of Wyoming, Brad W Basse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Noonan et al v. Harrington
as 3:2009cv03191
Plaintiff:
Dennis Noonan and Lana Noonan
Defendant:
Thomas Harrington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Michael Buesgens v. Beverly Hart, et al
as 09-15921
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL L. BUESGENS
Defendant - Appellee:
BEVERLY HART, JOHN A. WAHLUND, CUTTEN REALTY, INC and others
Michael Buesgens v. Beverly Hart, et al
as 09-15920
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL L. BUESGENS
Defendant - Appellee:
BEVERLY HART, JOHN A. WAHLUND, CUTTEN REALTY, INC and others
Michael Buesgens v. Beverly Hart, et al
as 09-15723
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL L. BUESGENS
Defendant - Appellee:
BEVERLY HART, JOHN A. WAHLUND, CUTTEN REALTY, INC and others
Michael Buesgens v. Beverly Hart, et al
as 09-15131
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL L. BUESGENS
Defendant - Appellee:
BEVERLY HART, JOHN A. WAHLUND, CUTTEN REALTY, INC and others
Buesgens et al v. Hart et al
as 3:2008cv05710
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Buesgens
Defendant:
Beverly Hart, John M. Wahlund, Cutten Realty, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Noonan et al v. Harrington
as 2:2008cv02282
Plaintiff:
Dennis Noonan and Lana Noonan
Defendant:
Thomas Harrington
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Harrington et al v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv04810
Plaintiff:
Maxine Harrington, Maxine Harrington, Thomas Harrington and others
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc., Gulf Stream Coach, Inc., Atwood Mobile Products, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Harrington v. United States of America
as 1:2008cv20332
Plaintiff:
Frederick Thomas Harrington
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
