Cases 21 - 30 of 61
CARAGEIN v. OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE et al
as 2:2016cv00732
Plaintiff:
JANE T. CARAGEIN and JAMES N. CARAGEIN, JR.
Defendant:
OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE , BLOOMING BRANDS, INC. , OSI RESTAURANT PARTNERS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VOLLMER et al v. RUSH WELLSITE SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00529
Plaintiff:
TOBY VOLLMER and RYAN JANKE
Defendant:
RUSH WELLSITE SERVICES, LLC and RUSH WELLSITE HOLDINGS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
CARROLL et al v. LANCASTER COUNTY et al
as 5:2016cv01580
Plaintiff:
JAMES CARROLL and MARY CARROLL
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY , DENNIS MOLYNEAUX , MALDONALDO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GRANT et al v. GREB
as 2:2016cv01250
Plaintiff:
BRUCE GRANT and TOBI GRANT
Defendant:
CHRISTINE E. GREB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TUCKER-SMART v. BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2015cv00210
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TUCKER-SMART
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, BEN SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT, GANSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCUSKER v. HIBU PLC et al
as 2:2014cv05670
Plaintiff:
JAMES McCUSKER
Defendant:
HIBU PLC , HIBU INC. , MIKE POCOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CAIRNS v. HIBU PLC et al
as 2:2014cv05671
Defendant:
ELIZABETH G. CHAMBERS, BOB GREGERSON, BOB WIGLEY and others
Plaintiff:
MARK CAIRNS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOOTEN v. WALSH
as 2:2013cv07347
Petitioner:
TOBY WOOTEN
Respondent:
JEROME WALSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Toby v. Lamas et al
as 3:2013cv02882
Petitioner:
Dennis Toby
Respondent:
Marirosa Lamas and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PILGRIM v. PFIZER INC. et al
as 2:2013cv02711
Plaintiff:
TOBI PILGRIM
Defendant:
PFIZER INC., PFIZER INTERNATIONAL LLC and J.B. ROERIG & COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
