Cases 21 - 30 of 163
Bachert v. North Carolina Department of Adult Correction et al ****
as 7:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Chester Bachert
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Adult Correction, Todd Ishee, Lamont Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bachert v. North Carolina Department of Adult Correction et al
as 5:2024ct03022
Plaintiff:
Chester Bachert
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Adult Correction, Todd Ishee, Lamont Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. Ishee
as 5:2024hc02003
Petitioner:
Michael Eugene Hunt
Respondent:
Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Noonsab v. Ishee
as 1:2024cv00004
Petitioner:
Somchai Noonsab
Respondent:
Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Meyers v. Vancey et al
as 5:2023ct03346
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
D. Vancey, Jason Farmer, Ms. Whittaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Jenkins et al
as 5:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Amy Jenkins, R. Honeycutt, Jeffrey P. Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickens v. Ishee
as 5:2023hc02269
Petitioner:
Brandon Michael Pickens
Respondent:
Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Meyers v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Peter Buchholtz, Brandeshawn Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. Ishee
as 5:2023hc02253
Petitioner:
Jameil L. Simpson
Respondent:
Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Steele v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023ct03314
Plaintiff:
Colell B. Steele
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Brandeshawn Harris, Peter Buchholtz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
