Cases filed in Tennessee
Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Sandford v. US Bank, NA et al
as 3:2013cv00381
Plaintiff: Chas A. Sandford
Defendant: US Bank, NA and Merscorp Holding, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Simpson et al v. US Bank National Association et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00325
Plaintiff: Ed Simpson and Deloris Simpson
Defendant: US Bank National Association, Wilson & Associates, PLLC, Becky Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
US Bank v. Ilar et al
as 3:2012cv00424
Plaintiff: US Bank
Defendant: James Ilar and Kristi Ilar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCormack et al v. US Bank
as 3:2012cv00100
Plaintiff: John W. McCormack
Defendant: US Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nooh v. Recontrust Company, N.A. Substitute Trustee et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv02506
Plaintiff: Abdul Nooh
Defendant: Recontrust Company, N.A. Substitute Trustee, Mortgage Electronic Registration System, The CIT Group/Consumer Finance, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
US Bank National Association et al v. Summers We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00039
Defendant: Hollis Fay Summers
Plaintiff: US Bank National Association and Debora Denise Griffin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. One 2004 GMC Envoy, et al
as 2:2011cv02028
Plaintiff: United States of America
Claimant: Nora L Lopez, Marco A Leyva, Lourdes Escobar and others
Defendant: One 2004 GMC Envoy, VIN 1GKES12S846170750, with All Appurtenances and Attachments Thereon
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00098
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?