Cases 21 - 30 of 89
Berry v. Wilson et al
as 3:2020cv00563
Petitioner:
Duane L Berry
Respondent:
Eric D Wilson and The United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Berry et al v. Wilson et al
as 4:2020cv00173
Respondent:
Warden Eric D Wilson and United States Marshal
Petitioner:
Federal Reserve Bank System Accounting TR, Federal Reserve Bank of New York and Duane Letroy Berry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Valentino v. United States Marshal
as 4:2020cv00304
Petitioner:
Joseph R Valentino
Respondent:
United States Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bauman v. United States Marshal Service
as 2:2020cv00016
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service
Plaintiff:
Paul Bauman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Mireles v. United States Marshalls Services
as 1:2020cv00011
Respondent:
Marshall Lara and United States Marshalls Services
Petitioner:
Rodolfo Mireles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Incorrectly Filed
as 2:2020cv00006
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service
Plaintiff:
Paul Bauman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Thibodeaux v. Kemp et al
as 6:2019cv00381
Defendant:
State Counselor Barbara L Law, Mark Calhoon, Office of Inspector General United States Marshal Service and others
Petitioner:
Paul Dewayne Thibodeaux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Polk v. GEO Joe Corley Detention Center et al
as 4:2019cv00327
Respondent:
GEO Joe Corley Detention Center
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service and Joe Corley Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Nelson Alexander Polk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Agnew v. United States Marshal Service
as 1:2019cv00033
Plaintiff:
Norman L Agnew
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Agnew v. United States Marshall Service et al
as 4:2019cv00055
Plaintiff:
Norman L Agnew
Defendant:
United States Marshall Service et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
