Cases 21 - 30 of 59
Montanez v. Keller et al
as 3:2013cv02564
Plaintiff:
Domingo Colon Montanez
Defendant:
Richard Keller, Bart Josefowicz, Kevin Miskell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. WALSH
as 2:2013cv05536
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ROBERT WILLIAMS
Respondent:
JEROME W. WALSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
THOMAS v. WALSH et al
as 2:2013cv04759
Petitioner:
VINCENT THOMAS
Respondent:
JEROME W. WALSH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FAIR v. WALSH et al
as 2:2013cv04550
Petitioner:
LEROY FAIR
Respondent:
JEROME W. WALSH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
AUSTIN et al v. USA
as 1:2013cv00446
Plaintiff:
LINDA G. AUSTIN , KELVY G. HILTON , RAYMOND ISADORE and others
Defendant:
USA
Langerston v. Walsh et al
as 4:2013cv01385
Plaintiff:
Darryl Langerston
Defendant:
Jerome W Walsh, Norman Demming, Mark Pall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Walsh v. Warden, Limon CF, et al
as 13-11994
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN W. WALSH
Respondent - Appellee:
GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA and WARDEN
BOND v. WALSH et al
as 2:2013cv01553
Petitioner:
LONDELL BOND
Respondent:
JEROME W. WALSH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation v. Dennis W. Walsh et al
as 2:2012cv08571
Defendant:
Does and Dennis W. Walsh
Plaintiff:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Reyes v. Walsh et al
as 1:2012cv02004
Plaintiff:
Kenneth B. Reyes
Defendant:
Jerome W. Walsh, David L. Popek, Captain Pall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
