Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Lyons et al v. V2 Logistics Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv00439
Plaintiff:
John Luke Lyons, Louise L. Tuttle and Craig W. Walsh
Defendant:
V2 Logistics Corp., AM2 Freight Operations, Inc. and Great Silk Road Transportation Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ernest WoodallIn re: Ernest Woodall
as 22-1703
Petitioner:
In re: ERNEST WOODALL
Respondent:
JEROME W. WALSH, Superintendant, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DAVID S. CERCONE
WASHINGTON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. SEGURO MEDICO LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00644
Plaintiff:
WASHINGTON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
SEGURO MEDICO LLC, HIC MARKETING GROUP INC., THE HIC GROUP INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
WALSH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv14679
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. WALSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PC) Davis v. Grase et al
as 1:2018cv01668
Defendant:
Jennifer Seymour, Barney Rosen, J. Grase and others
Plaintiff:
Terrence L. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Applegate v. CCI, et al.
as 1:2016cv01343
Plaintiff:
Brian Applegate
Defendant:
CCI, CCHCS, CDCR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Ernest Woodall
as 16-2788
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: ERNEST WOODALL
Defendant - Respondent:
JEROME W. WALSH, Superintendant and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Nominal Respondent:
DAVID S. CERCONE
Applegate v. Said et al
as 1:2016cv00289
Plaintiff:
Brian C. Applegate
Defendant:
K. Said, J. Walsh, W. Walsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. KANE et al
as 1:2016cv00032
Plaintiff:
HOWARD A. CARTER
Defendant:
KATHLEEN G. KANE, MICHALE KLOPOTOSKI, THOMAS LAVAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Beard et al
as 1:2015cv01424
Plaintiff:
Jasper F. Wilson
Defendant:
Jefferey A. Beard, M.D. Stainer, Kim Holland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
