Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Dillon v. Dooley et al
as 3:2014cv03018
Petitioner:
Kim Wade Dillon
Respondent:
Robert Bob Dooley, Jr. and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Schaffer et al v. Beringer et al
as 4:2014cv04138
Plaintiff:
Jill S. N. Schaffer and Callissa A. Schaffer
Defendant:
Bryan Beringer , Jacy Nelsen , Jessica Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cripps v. Jensen
as 4:2014cv04091
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Le Cripps
Defendant:
Wade K. Jensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Purchase v. Sturgis Police Department et al
as 5:2013cv05060
Plaintiff:
Steven Brian Purchase
Defendant:
Sturgis Police Department, Wade A. Deuter, Nichole Hodge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reints v. City of Rapid City, South Dakota et al
as 5:2013cv05043
Plaintiff:
John Reints
Defendant:
City of Rapid City, South Dakota, Travelers Insurance Companies, Inc., Jason Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bowles v. Dooley et al
as 5:2013cv05039
Petitioner:
Wade Elliot Bowles
Respondent:
Warden Dooley, Douglas Weber and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dillon v. Dooley
as 3:2013cv03001
Petitioner:
Kim Wade Dillon
Respondent:
Robert Bob Dooley
Defendant:
Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dillon v. Wilbur
as 3:2012cv03020
Petitioner:
Kim Wade Dillon
Respondent:
Lori S. Wilbur
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hardes et al v. NAU Country Insurance Company et al
as 3:2012cv03005
Plaintiff:
Wade Hardes , Keri Hardes , Penny Hardes and others
Defendant:
NAU Country Insurance Company, Rabo AgInsurance Services, Inc. , Amy Jo Hapka and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wade Bamberg v. USA
as 4:2009cv04041
Movant:
Wade Bamberg
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
