Cases 21 - 30 of 142
(PC) Hudson v. Wasco State Prison
as 1:2020cv00876
Defendant:
Wasco State Prison
Plaintiff:
Lugene Hudson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drake Felde v. USDC-CAFR
as 20-71403
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Not Classified By Court:
In re: DRAKE FELDE, I. OGBUEHI, Primary Care Physician at Pleasant Valley State Prison and D. WILKINS, Correctional Officer at Wasco State Prison
Petitioner:
DRAKE FELDE
Norman Hirscher v. John Sutton
as 19-56415
Respondent / Appellee:
JOHN SUTTON, Warden of Wasco State Prison
Petitioner / Appellant:
NORMAN HIRSCHER
Delton Taylor v. Harishkumar Patel, et al
as 19-16425
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DELTON L. TAYLOR
Defendant / Appellee:
HARISHKUMAR PATEL, Medical Doctor at Wasco State Prison and RICHARD LE, Medical Doctor at Wasco State Prison
Torres v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2019cv03851
Defendant:
Wasco State Prison, Captain T. Selby, M. Creamer and others
Plaintiff:
Mario Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Goods v. Wasco State Prison
as 1:2019cv00661
Plaintiff:
Charles Francis Goods
Defendant:
Wasco State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cervantes v. The Whole Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv00397
Plaintiff:
Ruben Tony Cervantes
Defendant:
The Whole Department of Corrections, W. L. Muniz, R. Manroy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Akaninyene Etuk v. Wasco State Prison
as 2:2018cv02259
Plaintiff:
Akaninyene Etuk
Defendant:
Wasco State Prison
Akaninyene Etuk v. Wasco State Prison
as 2:2018cv01564
Plaintiff:
Akaninyene Etuk
Defendant:
Wasco State Prison
Ivory v. State of California et al
as 1:2017cv01458
Plaintiff:
Norman Ivory
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation, Director of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
