Cases 21 - 30 of 22,015
Williams v. Charles Schwab Co.
as 8:2024cv01336
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Williams
Defendant:
Charles Schwab Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Goldfeder v. Williams,DO et al
as 9:2024cv80407
Plaintiff:
MD Bruce Wayne Goldfeder
Defendant:
Dr Ronald K. Williams,DO, United States, Cory P. Price and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Roberts v. Williams
as 3:2024cv00548
Plaintiff:
Derrick DeShun Roberts
Defendant:
J. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franqui v. United States of America
as 8:2024cv00914
Plaintiff:
William Franqui
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
DANIELS v. TAYLOR CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE et al
as 4:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DARRELL DANIELS
Defendant:
TAYLOR CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE, JULIE JONES, WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Palmer et al
as 3:2024cv00532
Plaintiff:
William Edward Wells, III
Defendant:
John Palmer, Barry Reddish, Kevin Tomlinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sneed v. Persad et al
as 2:2024cv14169
Plaintiff:
Jerry Sneed
Defendant:
Devanard Persad, Cory Gitlin, Zach Ferrira and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Robinson et al
as 0:2024cv60899
Plaintiff:
Quantell W. Williams
Defendant:
Austin J. Robinson and Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Beadle
as 2:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
William Thomas
Defendant:
Faye Beadle, R. Houston and Captain Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. United States of America
as 8:2024cv01311
Petitioner:
Shawn Williams
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
