Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Government Employees' Retirement System of the Virgin Islands et al v. Wageworks, Inc., et.al.
as 4:2018cv01523
Plaintiff:
Government Employees' Retirement System of the Virgin Islands
Defendant:
WageWorks, Inc., Joseph L. Jackson and Colm M. Callan
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Dean v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company et al
as 8:2017cv00446
Defendant:
Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company, Wageworks Inc. and Wageworks, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Dean
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv07575
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ed Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Kaparos v. Wageworks Inc., et al
as 1:2017cv05455
Defendant:
Wageworks Inc., doing business as Conexis, The Neiman Marcus Group LLC, Wagework Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Christine Kaparos
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Araksi Zhamkochyan v. CIT Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2017cv03379
Defendant:
CIT Bank, N.A. and WageWorks, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Araksi Zhamkochyan
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-12679
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thomas et al v. Graham Packaging Company LP et al
as 1:2015cv01500
Defendant:
Wageworks, Inc., Graham Packaging Health Benefit Plan and Graham Packaging Company LP
Not Classified By Court:
Mediator
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Thomas and Douglas M. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv00386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2011cv06722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
