Cases 21 - 30 of 749
Mulder v. Rich
as 5:2024hc02070
Petitioner:
William Brian Mulder
Respondent:
Warden David Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Middleton v. Kelly
as 5:2024hc02066
Petitioner:
Lamar Middleton
Respondent:
Warden Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Blakney v. Garland et al
as 5:2024hc02067
Petitioner:
Larry Blakney
Respondent:
Merrick Garland and Warden T. Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mendez Palacios v. Heckard
as 5:2024hc02061
Petitioner:
Gregori Jerson Mendez Palacios
Respondent:
Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
PARSONS v. GRAY et al
as 1:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE BLAINE PARSONS
Defendant:
WARDEN MR. GRAY, CAPTAIN MR. BURGESS, UNIT MANAGER MR. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amadi v. Heckard
as 5:2024hc02060
Petitioner:
Okechukwu Desmond Amadi
Respondent:
Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hanson v. Lee et al
as 5:2024ct03066
Plaintiff:
Rodger Hanson
Defendant:
Warden Talena Lee, Sergeant Randle, Unit Manager Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ransom v. Rich
as 5:2024hc02058
Petitioner:
Clarence Michael Ransom
Respondent:
Warden D. Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Littlejohn v. Hawkins
as 5:2024hc02054
Petitioner:
Jermaine Valgaue Littlejohn
Respondent:
Warden Shanticia Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CARANZA v. PYLES et al
as 1:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
JOSE M. CARANZA
Defendant:
OFFICER PYLES, OFFICER SHAFFER, WARDEN DAVID CASSIDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
