Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Jones v. Stenehjem
as 3:2013cv00020
Petitioner:
Robert Doyal Jones, Jr.
Respondent:
Wayne Stenehjem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holbach v. State of North Dakota et al
as 3:2013cv00015
Plaintiff:
Mitchell David Holbach
Defendant:
State of North Dakota and Wayne Stenehjem
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Corman v. Stenehjem et al
as 3:2012cv00114
Plaintiff:
Ryan Ray Corman
Defendant:
Wayne Stenehjem and Jonathan Byers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Corman v. Stenehjem et al
as 3:2012cv00091
Plaintiff:
Ryan Ray Corman
Defendant:
Wayne Stenehjem, Haley Wamstad, Andrew Eyre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Emineth v. Jaeger et al
as 1:2012cv00139
Plaintiff:
Gary Emineth
Defendant:
Alvin Jaeger , Wayne Stenehjem and Richard J. Riha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Corman v. Stenehjem et al
as 3:2012cv00053
Plaintiff:
Ryan Ray Corman
Defendant:
Wayne Stenehjem, Jonathan Byers, Ken Sorenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Annis et al v. Dalrymple et al
as 2:2011cv00073
Plaintiff:
Amber Annis , Lisa Casarez , William Crawford and others
Defendant:
Jack Dalrymple , Wayne Stenehjem , North Dakota Board of Higher Education and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Koenig v. Hoeven et al
as 2:2010cv00050
Plaintiff:
La Verne Koenig
Defendant:
John Hoeven, Wayne Stenehjem, Adams County States Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bala et al v. Stenehjem et al
as 1:2009cv00015
Plaintiff:
Susan Bala and RSI Holdings, Inc.
Defendant:
Wayne Stenehjem, Paul Bowlinger, Howard W Wrigley and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Becker v. Hudson et al
as 3:2007cv00096
Petitioner:
Jan F Becker
Defendant:
Warden Hudson, Michael B Mukasey, Kent Conrad and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
